Child porn Ile ilgili detaylı notlar

I'd like to address the troll comment quickly: I've spent a lot of years collecting the information I've been contributing to wikipedia, and although I'm hamiş particularly sensitive to disparaging remarks, this particular one irks me since it implies I'm a pest rather than a valuable asset. Much of the information I take the time to add to wikipedia is from non-web sources, or is otherwise extremely difficult or tedious to find.

Firstly this is confusing, what were these statistics on, were they on the harm child pornography does, were they on the rates of child pornography distrubtion? Secondly what evidence was there that these statistics were dubious, this looks to me like more pro child pornography yaymaca.

The article is about child pornography. The section is about examples of child pornography. There is nothing notable about that.

The section strongly suggests, but does not claim explicitly, that a court would find the photo pornographic if the definition were followed.

Thanks for the compliments on my writing. If you could go into more detail about what you think needs to be revised, I'll take a stab at fixing it, though I'd rather move on to polishing older sections of the article first before I begin rewriting new material. Qwasty 03:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's no telling if anything will come of it, or how far it will go. Just dropping it off here for others to decide:

I was molested at age 7 by a guy who had piles of ponography all over his house and a Nazi flag in his den. It was SICK, SICK, SICK, Dont come off and tell me its harmless kakım long kakım whatever. Olağan Pornography, when in the hands of some asshole who is "infatuated with children" emanet cause him to do "EVIL" things that he might not have done otherwise.

Man died of heart attack while digging hole to bury woman he had just killed, South Carolina police say

Although governments rarely publish examples of what they consider to be child pornography, they sometimes provide detailed descriptions:

I noticed on your recent changes you put in 'directly'. While I do agree that simulated child porn doesn't directly harm children, I also don't think it harms them period. What evidence is there for simulated child porn encouraging child molestation? Probably about bey much bey videoteyp games encouraging gun violence.

There are millions of wonderful Jewish people in the world, but defending a vague fiction called the “Jewish character” when you’re breaking up or greatly inconveniencing actual families, reeks of a twisted psychological outgassing of the ghost of Adolph Hitler -- “Hey, let’s preserve the German character by breaking all the windows in the Jews’ shops -- and then killing the fuckers!”

Case in point. A certain American person I knew of took four nude photos of a 12yo nephew. No sex acts, just nude after getting out of the pool: insane to call it porn, period.

"Available studies show that the majority of viewers appear to be male adolescents, and many of them are minor Sahte cialis satan site adolescents themselves."

Held: COPA’s reliance on “community standards” to identify what material “is harmful to minors” does not by itself render the statute substantially overbroad for First Amendment purposes. The Court, however, expresses no view as to whether COPA suffers from substantial overbreadth for reasons other than its use of community standards, whether the statute is unconstitutionally vague, or whether the statute survives strict scrutiny.